A federal judge just blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to seize Minnesota’s full voter rolls, calling the request a “fishing expedition” and ruling the feds had no legal right to access that private data. Minnesota officials called the move politically motivated and overreaching, especially with ICE agents allegedly exceeding their mandate. The court’s decision protects voter privacy and joins a growing list of similar rulings across 23 other states — all of which have rejected federal demands for unredacted election data. Minnesota, known for its secure elections, had no legal basis to comply, and the ruling brings much-needed relief to voters concerned about their personal information. This case underscores courts’ consistent defense of state privacy rights against federal overreach in election processes.
Listen in comfort: Get a discount on a Soli Pillow: http://solipillow.com/discount/dnn.
Advertise on DNN: advertise@thednn.ai
This is an automated, high-level news summary based on public reporting. Report issues to feedback@thednn.ai.
Podden och tillhörande omslagsbild på den här sidan tillhör
The Daily News Now!. Innehållet i podden är skapat av The Daily News Now! och inte av,
eller tillsammans med, Poddtoppen.
